Holscher’s Kansas support divides by education, 62% among voters with at least a bachelor’s degree versus 34% among those without one.

721 likely voters · margin of error ±6.0 points

College = bachelor or graduate degree; noncollege = answered lower categories, including vocational and associate degrees. Likely voters in the named October state and district polls; not a national sample or forecast. Pooled figures are respondent-proportional descriptive summaries of separate electorates. Each poll’s subgroup weights are normalized to its answered-question n; repeated people remain in record n but their weights are collapsed for Kish effective n. MOEs are approximate pointwise 95% half-widths in percentage points, without adjustment for exploratory multiple comparisons. They do not include all coverage, nonresponse, recall, calibration or selection uncertainty. Wald intervals can extend outside percentage bounds; an observed zero is not a population zero. Unknown and indifferent answers remain in denominators. Fewer than 50 distinct people is suppressed; 50–99 means interpret with caution.

62.1% of likely voters with a bachelor’s or graduate degree in KS support Cindy Holscher, Democrat (95% margin of error ±6.0 points; n=721, 721 distinct people, effective n=250.7). 31.5% of likely voters with a bachelor’s or graduate degree in KS support Ty Masterson, Republican (95% margin of error ±5.7 points; n=721, 721 distinct people, effective n=250.7). 33.7% of likely voters without a bachelor’s degree in KS support Cindy Holscher, Democrat (95% margin of error ±6.2 points; n=554, 554 distinct people, effective n=220.9). 60.4% of likely voters without a bachelor’s degree in KS support Ty Masterson, Republican (95% margin of error ±6.4 points; n=554, 554 distinct people, effective n=220.9). The featured estimate uses 721 responses from 721 distinct people, with an effective sample size of 250.7. College = bachelor or graduate degree; noncollege = answered lower categories, including vocational and associate degrees. Likely voters in the named October state and district polls; not a national sample or forecast. Pooled figures are respondent-proportional descriptive summaries of separate electorates. Each poll’s subgroup weights are normalized to its answered-question n; repeated people remain in record n but their weights are collapsed for Kish effective n. MOEs are approximate pointwise 95% half-widths in percentage points, without adjustment for exploratory multiple comparisons. They do not include all coverage, nonresponse, recall, calibration or selection uncertainty. Wald intervals can extend outside percentage bounds; an observed zero is not a population zero. Unknown and indifferent answers remain in denominators. Fewer than 50 distinct people is suppressed; 50–99 means interpret with caution.