U.S. Senate
Democratic primary for U.S. Senate
Question details
| Response | Percent | Interviews | 95% margin | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John F. Reed | 60.7% | — | — | |
| Undecided | 15.2% | — | — | |
| Connor F. Burbridge | 12.2% | — | — | |
| Someone else | 7.8% | — | — | |
| Luis Daniel Muñoz | 4.1% | — | — |
Published Model D compared with unofficial election returns.
Differences are poll minus election result. Both columns show shares among named candidates; undecided and “someone else” responses are excluded, not allocated. The original published percentages appear in the survey charts below.
Election returns · Updated Sep 12, 2026 · Not yet certified
These are later reconstructions using the recorded models and final response set. They do not replace the published poll above.
| Candidate | Model A | Model B | Model C | Model D | Election |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Buonanno Foulkes | 61.3% -1.2 pp | 61.6% -0.8 pp | 64.1% +1.7 pp | 61.8% -0.7 pp | 62.5% |
| Daniel J. McKee | 38.8% +1.2 pp | 38.4% +0.8 pp | 35.9% -1.7 pp | 38.2% +0.7 pp | 37.5% |
A: Raw responses · 1,412 interviews
B: Frozen original weighted · 1,412 interviews
C: Siena-style turnout model (partial) · 1,412 interviews
D: Model D · L2/Census likely-electorate model · 1,412 interviews
Population: Registered voters. No validated respondent-level likely-voter component was applied, so these estimates describe registered voters.
Likely voters: None (not validated).
Weighted responses. Undecided answers are shown separately.
Democratic primary for U.S. Senate
| Response | Percent | Interviews | 95% margin | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John F. Reed | 60.7% | — | — | |
| Undecided | 15.2% | — | — | |
| Connor F. Burbridge | 12.2% | — | — | |
| Someone else | 7.8% | — | — | |
| Luis Daniel Muñoz | 4.1% | — | — |
Democratic primary for Governor
| Response | Percent | Interviews | 95% margin | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Buonanno Foulkes | 51.1% | — | — | |
| Daniel J. McKee | 31.2% | — | — | |
| Undecided | 9.0% | — | — | |
| Someone else | 8.8% | — | — |
Democratic primary for Lieutenant Governor
| Response | Percent | Interviews | 95% margin | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xaykham Rexford Khamsyvoravong | 25.3% | — | — | |
| Sabina Matos | 22.7% | — | — | |
| Undecided | 19.5% | — | — | |
| Susan Anderbois | 12.8% | — | — | |
| Someone else | 8.3% | — | — | |
| Cynthia Armour Coyne | 8.0% | — | — | |
| Ross McCurdy | 3.4% | — | — |
Democratic primary for Attorney General
| Response | Percent | Interviews | 95% margin | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith Hoffmann | 28.0% | — | — | |
| Kimberly Ahern | 26.8% | — | — | |
| Joseph J. Solomon | 16.6% | — | — | |
| Undecided | 16.5% | — | — | |
| Jason P. Knight | 6.4% | — | — | |
| Someone else | 5.8% | — | — |
| Age | John F. Reed | Undecided | Connor F. Burbridge | Someone else | Luis Daniel Muñoz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 60.7% | 15.2% | 12.2% | 7.8% | 4.1% |
| 18-29Withheld: Base too small | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30-44 | 34.8% | 23.8% | 26.6% | 6.6% | 8.2% |
| 45-54 | 54.7% | 15.1% | 12.7% | 9.8% | 7.7% |
| 55-64 | 59.0% | 17.2% | 7.5% | 11.8% | 4.5% |
| 65+ | 74.2% | 11.8% | 6.1% | 6.2% | 1.7% |
* Small sample. A dash means the estimate is withheld because too few interviews support it; the reason is shown. Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding.
Field dates: September 4–8, 2026. 1,405 completed interviews among likely Democratic-primary voters. These are the original published Model D percentages, preserved from the September 9 website archive. Already-voted respondents reported their vote; other qualified likely voters reported their current choice. Weighting used the L2/Census likely-electorate model. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place. Crosstab estimates with insufficient raw or effective subgroup bases are withheld. The later September 14 reanalysis does not replace this public record.
These records come from the same fieldwork as stored with the Rhode Island 2026 Democratic Primary Poll — September 14 Post-Election Reanalysis (published September 14, 2026, 1,412 interviews). Response rates, dispositions and disclosure items describe that fieldwork; the trimming and shadow estimate describe that release's weighting, not the archived percentages above.
e = 0.9564: proportional allocation (the default of AAPOR Survey Outcome Rate Calculator 5.1 (2023), List Samples sheet) over the 13,419 cases whose eligibility was settled by contact (12,834 eligible, 585 screened out). Duplicate listings are left out because the frame check removed them from every drawn case. The questionnaire has no eligibility screener, and the Standard Definitions treat an unreached named-list case as eligible when none is required.
| AAPOR code | Disposition | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Complete interview | 1,412 |
| 2.1121 | Opened the survey, answered no question | 2 |
| 2.1133 | Replied STOP to the invitation | 8,713 |
| 2.12 | Break-off: started the survey (web link or phone) and stopped before completing it | 2,707 |
| 3.20 | Invitation delivered, no response | 128,383 |
| 3.219 | Invitation not delivered | 1,962 |
| 3.23 | Not attempted: no invitation sent and no call dialed | 109,762 |
| 3.9 | Invitation sent, no delivery status returned | 17,879 |
| 4.1 | Screened out as not eligible | 585 |
| Sample frame | Drawn | Completes | RR1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RI-01 2026 Democratic Primary — outside Providence | 114,914 | 606 | 0.5% |
| RI-02 2026 Democratic Primary — outside Providence | 122,077 | 609 | 0.5% |
| RI-01 + Providence Mayor 2026 Democratic Primary | 18,330 | 106 | 0.6% |
| RI-02 + Providence Mayor 2026 Democratic Primary | 15,499 | 91 | 0.6% |
| Race (voter file) | Drawn | Completes | RR1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74,293 | 338 | 0.5% |
| Asian American or Pacific Islander | 157 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Black | 393 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hispanic | 16,339 | 55 | 0.3% |
| White | 179,638 | 1,019 | 0.6% |
| File party | Drawn | Completes | RR1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115,822 | 623 | 0.5% |
| Democrat | 64,036 | 436 | 0.7% |
| No Party | 90,962 | 353 | 0.4% |
| Age band | Drawn | Completes | RR1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18-24 | 7,072 | 14 | 0.2% |
| 25-34 | 26,090 | 61 | 0.2% |
| 35-44 | 40,065 | 121 | 0.3% |
| 45-54 | 37,403 | 163 | 0.4% |
| 55-64 | 52,375 | 265 | 0.5% |
| 65+ | 107,815 | 788 | 0.7% |
Rates use the formulas of the AAPOR Survey Outcome Rate Calculator 5.1 (2023), List Samples sheet; RR1 counts every drawn voter except duplicate listings.
Bounds: 0.25 to 4.0 (weight relative to a mean base weight of 1).
Weights trimmed: 100 (strategy: within each raking pass).
Design effect before trimming: not recorded. This weighting run predates the trimming report, and its untrimmed weights have not been reproduced from storage.
Design effect after trimming: 1.575.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the data-defect spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the A + recall spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the A + education spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the A + post-ballot partials spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the LV fitted spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not applicable. This is a dem_primary election; the A + covariate undecided allocation spec covers only general and special elections.
Status: not recorded. This weighting run stores no turnout scenarios; they are recorded on November 3, 2026 general and special polls weighted from 2026-10-05.
Invitation text (wave 1), 83,100 sent: "Hi {first_name}, As a {locality} voter, share your views in a RedBox Research survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,595 sent: "Hi {first_name}, RedBox Research is polling {locality} voters about the {election_name}. Share your opinion ({survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,418 sent: "Hi {first_name}, We are looking for insight from {community} voters. Take a {survey_minutes} MIN RedBox Research poll: {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,169 sent: "Hi {first_name}, As a {locality} voter, share your views in a Red Box Research survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,099 sent: "Hi {first_name}, Red Box Research invites you to share your views in our voter survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,069 sent: "Hi {first_name}, Help represent voters like you in a Red Box Research voter survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,051 sent: "Hi {first_name}, Share your views on the {election_name} in a Red Box Research survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 9,023 sent: "Hi {first_name}, Red Box Research voter survey ({survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} STOP to end. HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 8,974 sent: "Hi {first_name}, Make your voice heard in a Red Box Research voter survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Invitation text (wave 1), 5,145 sent: "Hi {first_name}, A political text that does not want your money. RedBox Research just wants your opinion ({survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Reminder text (wave 2), 6,754 sent: "Hi {first_name}, As a {locality} voter, share your views in a RedBox Research survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Reminder text (wave 3), 187 sent: "Hi {first_name}, As a {locality} voter, share your views in a RedBox Research survey (about {survey_minutes} MIN): {survey_url} Reply STOP to end; HELP for help."
Reminder texts (wave 2), 11,370 sent from 5 templates whose wording is not stored with the poll.
Words in braces were filled in for each recipient when the text was sent.
Introduction: the frozen questionnaire has no welcome screen, so the survey opened on its first question.
The survey was self-administered on the web: there was no interviewer or AI script.
Standard: AAPOR Standard Definitions, 10th edition (2023), list samples: section 1.3 (phone surveys of named persons) and section 1.6 (SMS surveys of named persons).
Final dispositions of the 271,405 drawn cases:
1.1 Complete interview: 1,412
2.1121 Opened the survey, answered no question: 2
2.1133 Replied STOP to the invitation: 8,713
2.12 Break-off: started the survey (web link or phone) and stopped before completing it: 2,707
3.20 Invitation delivered, no response: 128,383
3.219 Invitation not delivered: 1,962
3.23 Not attempted: no invitation sent and no call dialed: 109,762
3.9 Invitation sent, no delivery status returned: 17,879
4.1 Screened out as not eligible: 585
Outcome rates: RR1 0.5%; RR3 0.5%; COOP1 11.0%; REF1 4.2%; CON1 4.7%.
179,954 text invitations sent, 0 calls dialed.
Text message to the web survey: 161,643 cases attempted. RR1 0.9%; RR3 0.9%; COOP1 11.0%; REF1 7.1%; CON1 8.0%.
Each mode counts only the people it tried to reach and only the interviews completed in that mode: a voter texted who then finished by phone is a text non-complete and a phone complete. Each mode's RR3 uses the release's e.
Each voter's final disposition is the most informative outcome across every text and call (AAPOR Standard Definitions, 10th edition, pp. 9 and 13): a complete in either mode, then a screen-out, then a refusal or break-off, then the most informative unreached outcome.
e = 0.9564: proportional allocation (the default of AAPOR Survey Outcome Rate Calculator 5.1 (2023), List Samples sheet) over the 13,419 cases whose eligibility was settled by contact (12,834 eligible, 585 screened out). Duplicate listings are left out because the frame check removed them from every drawn case. The questionnaire has no eligibility screener, and the Standard Definitions treat an unreached named-list case as eligible when none is required.
Rhode Island Democratic Primary Poll 2026
Version 1 · Published Sep 9, 2026
Release: 5c510fbd1
Source checksum: f2898e10a126920f2a27f6d7df0c79a6efa700d3cd6c16a8cb172a997bc00cf9